About the Role

Contribute legal expertise to an AI project focused on evaluating lawful and unlawful boundary cases in defense and international law. You will help ensure policy scenarios and model evaluations reflect rigorous application of the law of armed conflict and international law.

What You'll Do

Develop detailed scenarios involving lawful policy review and the limits of military support.

Assess whether taxonomy boundaries are legally defensible under the law of armed conflict and international law.

Analyze and grade model responses for legal reasoning, clear limitations, and appropriate treatment of uncertainty.

Identify cases where a model refuses to address legitimate legal or policy questions.

Provide clear written and verbal feedback and collaborate with subject-matter experts on disputed cases.

What We're Looking For

Background as a Judge Advocate or substantial experience in international humanitarian law and the law of armed conflict.

Fluency in rules of engagement and knowledge of lawful boundaries in military and surveillance operations.

Experience advising on operational legal matters in military or government settings.

Strong written and verbal communication skills, including the ability to explain complex legal concepts.

Skill in policy review, distinguishing between cases, and reasoning through legal uncertainty.

Teaching, consulting, or advisory experience in military law or international law is useful.

Familiarity with AI governance, ethics, or AI-related legal frameworks is a plus.

Location

Fully remote. Visa sponsorship is not available.